Sunday, 18 March 2012

Cultural Semiotics

Back in January we had a lecture by Matt Hawthorn looking at amongst other things Semiotics and Culture. The main point I want to talk about that I got from what Matt had to say was the idea of Semiotics and how culture plays its part within the area of semiotics.

Matt defined semiotics as ‘How the world can be viewed’ or ‘How we get meaning from it’.
One definition of Culture is ‘the behaviours and beliefs characteristic of a particular social, ethical or age group’ (dictionary.com)

By viewing semiotics through the use of culture I want to answer the question ‘In my work, can nature be taken too far in abstract design for fantasy purposes, so that it no longer becomes believable?'

In Semiotics there are two parts:  a Signifier and a Signified.
The Signifier is what the ‘thing’ is- so is it an aesthetic piece of art, an experience, an object etc.
The Signified is the meaning of the ‘thing’.

To get from the Signifier to the Signified the viewer must go through a process. My argument is that everyone belongs to some sort of culture, whether that be ethical, age, social, fashion, film, beliefs etc. Therefore everyone can identify something using their cultural experiences- the results may be different but the core semiotic of culture is the same.

For example:



Person A and B look at the signifier, whether that be some art, an object, an event etc They then both form some sort of conclusion or Signified result by using Cultural Semiotics.

Person A may use their past experience of Structure to form a conclusion, whereas Person B may use Politics and come out with a completely different answer; however, by both using their experience of culture, either the same or different, they have gained an experience of the object, and as everyone is part of some sort of culture, everyone can experience something and gain some sort of meaning from it.

Therefore looking back at my original question; ‘In my work, can nature be taken too far in abstract design for fantasy purposes, so that it no longer becomes believable?’ my answer would be no it cannot. Each person throughout their life gains different experiences yet all experience in some way a form of culture. So if I design something nature related each person could view it through the eyes of their culture and from that past experience form some meaning personal to themselves, therefore them accepting it as something.

As long as the design can link with one of the above cultural elements, and as everyone can relate in some way to a type of culture, it would suggest that on some level it can always be believable.




Based on the lecture by Matt Hawthorn, January 23rd 2012, Poetics of Research Practice

Alexander McQueen

Alexander McQueen is one of Britain’s best known Fashion Designers. London born McQueen left school age 16 and was offered an apprenticeship at Savile Row Tailors Anderson and Shephard. In his early twenties he worked for Koji Tatsuno and then became Romeo Gigli’s design assistant. In less the 10 years McQueen became one of the world’s most respected fashion designers.

The following are some examples of his work. These particular images use nature as their inspiration and personally I think they are really beautiful. They are a good example of how a designer has used the natural world as their source of inspiration.

Alexander McQueen antler dress accessed 18-03-12

Alexander McQueen bird dress accessed 18-03-12

Alexander McQueen butterfly dress accessed 18-03-12
http://slimpaley.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/alexander-mcqueen03.jpg?w=600

Alexander McQueen butterfly hat accessed 18-03-12
http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l6e63ry0H71qcmfxio1_400.jpg

Alexander McQueen butterfly shoes accessed 18-03-12
http://www.pushitmagazine.com/1/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/alexander_mcqueen_spring_2011-2_thumb.jpg

Alexander McQueen butterfly wing dress accessed 18-03-12

Alexander McQueen dress accessed 18-03-12

Alexander McQueen dress2 accessed 18-03-12
http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/the-ticket/css/mcQMAIN.jpg

Alexander McQueen flower dress accessed 18-03-12
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNmnUZa2f7WAKqocDIqv_6VUAKl23R3FLe5rkYicCt6K59AWYO7uhHEcb3nXen0aA3mGA37jk7bb8wM-Ztl1gBF22FFbXGc8wEU71RIFUXpmttUAcr1oCZi-8Y_tyxPd3NYt9hhpraiLw/s1600/Picture+16.png

Alexander McQueen image accessed 18-03-12
http://editorialpursuits.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/w-magazine-sanctuary-alexander-mcqueen.jpg?w=500&h=323

Film Focus: The Truman Show

I was watching the Truman Show on TV the other day and one of the characters said something quite interesting:

“We accept the reality of the world for which we are presented”
Truman Show (1998)

In this context the character was saying that even though the world seemed false to the audience, to Truman (the main character) it was perfectly normal.
This links quite well with my project. If a designer can establish a reality at the start of a film it will make it more believable for the audience. If the characters believe it then the audience will believe it.